Flight from a Peace Officer in Canada: Legal Guide

Over 2,000 Canadians face criminal charges yearly for not stopping when signaled by police. This offense carries serious consequences. Failing to pull over for flashing lights could lead to criminal charges.

Section 320.17 of the Criminal Code defines evading arrest by vehicle. Operating a motor vehicle while pursued by authorities and not stopping “without reasonable excuse” is a crime.

This charge can result in jail time and long driving bans. The legal system treats this behavior seriously. It creates dangerous situations for everyone on the road.

This guide explains the legal framework, penalties, and your rights if charged. Understanding your obligations when interacting with law enforcement is essential. It helps you navigate these complex legal issues.

What Constitutes Flight from a Peace Officer

Flight from a peace officer is a serious crime in Canada. It happens when drivers purposely don’t stop for police. This offense endangers public safety and challenges law enforcement authority.

Knowing what makes up this crime can help you avoid legal trouble. It can also help you make smart choices if police confront you while driving.

Definition Under Canadian Law

The Criminal Code of Canada defines flight from a peace officer under Section 320.17. This law applies to anyone operating a motor vehicle or vessel.

“Being pursued by a peace officer operating a vehicle or vessel, fail, without reasonable excuse, to stop the vehicle or vessel as soon as is reasonable in the circumstances.”

Key elements include knowing police are chasing you and not stopping on purpose. Having no good reason to keep going is also important.

Fleeing the scene of a police stop is a federal criminal matter. It’s not just a traffic violation and carries heavy penalties.

Common Scenarios and Examples

This offense can happen in many situations. Even if the initial reason for police attention seems small, it can still be serious.

  • Accelerating when seeing police lights activate behind your vehicle
  • Making evasive maneuvers through traffic to avoid pursuing officers
  • Continuing to drive at normal speed while ignoring police sirens and lights
  • Attempting to evade police checkpoints by taking detours
  • Failure to comply with an officer’s signal to pull over at a traffic stop

If you panic and drive home instead of stopping for police, you could face charges. Making a U-turn to avoid a roadblock could also count as this offense.

These actions can lead to charges even if you weren’t committing any other crime. It’s always best to stop when police signal you to do so.

Legal Framework in the Criminal Code of Canada

Canada’s Criminal Code outlines specific laws about fleeing from police. This offense goes beyond traffic violations. It’s a serious crime under flight from a peace officer provisions.

The Criminal Code treats this offense severely. It represents resisting law enforcement and creates public safety risks. Fleeing often leads to dangerous high-speed chases, endangering many lives.

Section 320.17 Provisions

Section 320.17 of the Criminal Code defines this offense. It states:

“Everyone commits an offence who operates a motor vehicle or vessel while being pursued by a peace officer and who fails, without reasonable excuse, to stop the motor vehicle or vessel as soon as is reasonable in the circumstances.”

This is a hybrid offense, giving prosecutors flexibility. Serious cases may be indictable. Less severe ones may lead to summary conviction.

The law requires three key elements. These are: operating a vehicle, knowing police are in pursuit, and failing to stop. This balances enforcement needs with possible reasons for delayed stopping.

Historical Development of the Law

The law on fleeing police has changed over time. It was first under Section 249.1 of the Criminal Code. This addressed concerns about dangerous police chases.

In 2018, reforms moved this law to Section 320.17. This change was part of updating Canada’s approach to vehicle-related crimes.

Over time, laws have gotten tougher on obstruction of justice through fleeing. Early versions had lighter penalties. As chase dangers became clear, Parliament increased consequences.

These changes show Canada’s view of fleeing as a major safety threat. Modern laws balance deterrence with fair punishment based on each case.

Elements Required to Prove the Offense

Canadian courts require prosecutors to prove specific elements in flight from peace officer cases. These elements must be established beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction. Understanding these components is vital for legal experts and those facing charges.

Three main elements must be proven: operating a motor vehicle, knowing about police pursuit, and willfully failing to stop. Each element has specific legal requirements under Canadian law.

Operating a Motor Vehicle

Prosecutors must show the accused was operating a motor vehicle during the alleged offense. “Operating” includes being in care or control of the vehicle’s movement.

Courts consider “operating” to include being behind the wheel with the engine running, even when stationary. This excludes passengers without vehicle control.

The law applies to all motor vehicles, including cars, trucks, motorcycles, ATVs, and motorized boats. The reckless driving component often starts with establishing who controlled the vehicle.

Knowledge of Police Pursuit

Proving the accused knew or should have known about police pursuit is crucial. This is often shown through evidence of visible or audible police signals.

Typical signals include flashing lights, sirens, or clear gestures from uniformed officers. The prosecution must prove these signals were reasonably detectable by the accused.

Valid defenses may include legitimate unawareness due to factors like heavy rain or hearing impairment. Courts consider whether a reasonable person would have recognized the signals.

Willful Failure to Stop

The third element involves proving intentional failure to stop despite awareness of police pursuit. This focuses on the driver’s actions after noticing police signals.

Evidence of willful failure typically includes:

  • Accelerating away from police
  • Making evasive maneuvers
  • Ignoring multiple opportunities to safely pull over
  • Continuing to drive for an extended period despite clear signals

The prosecution must show no reasonable excuse for not stopping, such as a genuine emergency or safety concern.

Intent Requirements

Intent is crucial in proving willful failure to stop. The Crown must show the accused deliberately chose not to comply with police signals.

Courts differentiate between brief confusion and deliberate evasion. A short delay might be explained, while prolonged driving suggests intentional evasion.

Prosecutors often use circumstantial evidence to establish intent, including:

Behavior Inference of Intent Potential Defense
Increased speed Deliberate attempt to escape Fear or panic reaction
Evasive maneuvers Calculated effort to avoid capture Defensive driving due to road conditions
Turning off headlights Attempt to hide from police Mechanical failure or confusion
Extended pursuit duration Sustained decision to evade Looking for safe location to stop

Reasonable Person Standard

Canadian courts use the “reasonable person standard” when evaluating offense elements. This test considers what a reasonable person would do in similar circumstances.

For example, a reasonable person would recognize police lights and sirens as a signal to pull over. They would stop as soon as safely possible, not drive for several kilometers.

This standard helps courts distinguish between misunderstandings and deliberate evasion attempts. It considers factors like road conditions, time of day, and traffic density.

The reasonable person standard is crucial when evaluating claims of unawareness or delayed stopping. Courts examine if the explanation would satisfy an ordinary, prudent person with normal judgment.

Categories and Severity of Flight from a Peace Officer

Flight from peace officer charges in Canada fall into different categories and severity levels. The Criminal Code classifies it as a hybrid offense. Crown prosecutors can choose to proceed by indictment or summary conviction.

The categorization depends on the conduct during the flight and any resulting harm. The circumstances determine how the Crown handles each case.

Simple Flight Offenses

Simple flight occurs when a driver fails to stop for police without causing additional harm. These cases are serious but represent the lower end of the severity spectrum.

Crown attorneys consider several factors when prosecuting simple flight cases. The duration of the pursuit is important, as longer chases suggest more deliberation by the driver.

The speeds reached during the incident also play a crucial role. High-speed pursuit situations are treated more severely by the courts.

Other factors include traffic conditions, time of day, and population density. The driver’s behavior is also considered. Simple flight creates risk and diverts police resources from other duties.

Flight Causing Bodily Harm or Death

When flight from police causes bodily harm or death, the offense becomes much more serious. These cases carry heavier penalties due to their grave consequences.

Public safety endangerment is a major concern in these cases. Courts view flight incidents resulting in injuries or deaths very seriously.

These cases often involve dangerous driving like speeding, running red lights, or driving into oncoming traffic. Innocent bystanders can become victims in such situations.

Causation Analysis

In harm or death cases, proving causation is crucial. The Crown must show a direct link between fleeing and the harm.

Courts examine if the harm was foreseeable and not too remote from the original offense. They consider if any intervening acts broke the chain of causation.

For example, if a pedestrian is hit during a chase, the court checks if it was foreseeable. They determine if it resulted from the decision to flee.

Criminal Negligence Considerations

In serious flight cases, criminal negligence is often central. The prosecution must show the accused disregarded others’ safety during the pursuit.

This requires evidence of particularly dangerous driving behaviors. Courts look at factors such as:

  • Excessive speeds in residential or school zones
  • Dangerous maneuvers through heavy traffic
  • Driving on sidewalks or through parks
  • Ignoring traffic signals at busy intersections

Proving criminal negligence impacts the offense classification and resulting penalties. It shows that flight from police creates substantial risks for everyone on the road.

Penalties and Sentencing Guidelines

Evading arrest in Canada has serious legal consequences. Penalties depend on the offense’s severity and the Crown’s prosecution approach. The justice system views flight from a peace officer as a major public safety threat.

These penalties can impact your life long after jail time. Understanding them is crucial for anyone facing such charges.

Summary Conviction Consequences

Summary conviction offenses usually involve less serious circumstances. These may include brief pursuits or situations with lower public safety risks. The maximum penalty is up to two years less a day in jail.

Courts consider factors like driving record and pursuit length when sentencing. First-time offenders might get probation or community service. However, most cases include at least a one-year driving ban.

Indictable Offense Penalties

Serious cases of evading arrest are indictable offenses. These often involve high-speed chases or dangerous driving. Maximum penalties can reach 10 years in prison.

The Crown typically chooses indictment for:

– Excessive speeds in populated areas

– Dangerous maneuvers risking others

– Prior similar convictions

– Flight while impaired

Indictable convictions usually include long driving bans. These can last from years to a lifetime. Courts may also order hefty fines and driver education programs.

Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Basic flight from a peace officer doesn’t have mandatory minimums. However, certain factors trigger automatic minimums. The most serious is when flight causes bodily harm or death.

Courts must consider these aggravating factors:

– Children in the vehicle

– Impairment by alcohol or drugs

– Offense during a street race

– Operating a large motor vehicle

The following table shows potential penalties for different situations:

Offense Type Maximum Penalty Driving Prohibition Additional Consequences
Summary Conviction 2 years less a day 1-3 years Fines, probation, community service
Indictable Offense 10 years imprisonment 3 years to lifetime Larger fines, mandatory programs
Flight Causing Bodily Harm 14 years imprisonment Minimum 5 years Mandatory minimums apply
Flight Causing Death Life imprisonment Lifetime ban possible Severe mandatory minimums

A flight from a peace officer conviction has lasting effects. It can lead to higher insurance rates and job problems. The criminal record may impact many aspects of your life for years.

Provincial Variations in Enforcement and Penalties

Each Canadian province handles fleeing from police differently. The Criminal Code sets federal standards, but provinces add their own rules. This creates a mix of criminal charges and administrative penalties for fleeing the scene.

You might face different consequences depending on where the incident occurs. The legal landscape is complex, with varying provincial regulations.

Ontario Highway Traffic Act Provisions

Ontario has strict penalties for failure to comply with police signals to stop. Your license can be suspended immediately when charged. Your vehicle may also be impounded for seven days.

If convicted, you face a minimum one-year license suspension for a first offense. Repeat offenses lead to longer suspensions. Insurance premiums often double or triple after a conviction.

Quebec Highway Safety Code Approach

Quebec focuses on administrative penalties alongside criminal sanctions. Authorities can suspend your license for up to 90 days when charged. This happens regardless of criminal proceedings.

Quebec uses a demerit point system that can lead to additional suspensions. You may need to complete driving courses before getting your license back.

Western Provinces’ Enforcement Patterns

Western provinces have unique strategies for handling flight from peace officers. British Columbia’s Motor Vehicle Act allows for extended vehicle impoundment, sometimes over 30 days.

Alberta has special traffic units to catch drivers who flee. Saskatchewan has specific protocols for police pursuits. These balance public safety with the need to catch offenders.

Province Immediate Consequences License Suspension Vehicle Impoundment Special Features
Ontario Immediate license suspension Minimum 1 year 7 days Severe insurance penalties
Quebec 90-day administrative suspension Variable based on demerit points 30 days Remedial driving courses
British Columbia Immediate roadside prohibition Up to 2 years 30+ days Extended impoundment periods
Alberta Immediate license suspension 1-5 years 7 days Specialized enforcement units
Saskatchewan Administrative suspension Up to 3 years 14 days Specific pursuit protocols

Collateral Consequences of Conviction

A conviction for fleeing from law enforcement in Canada brings severe consequences. These secondary penalties can disrupt your life more than the initial criminal sanctions. Resisting law enforcement triggers automatic penalties affecting mobility, finances, and future opportunities.

Driver’s License Suspensions

License suspensions after a flight conviction are almost guaranteed across Canada. First-time offenders face minimum one-year suspensions, while repeat offenders face longer periods. These suspensions are separate from court-ordered driving prohibitions.

Provincial licensing authorities may require additional steps before reinstating your driving privileges. You might need to complete various programs and assessments.

  • Remedial driving programs
  • Substance abuse assessments
  • Medical evaluations
  • Driver reexamination tests

Insurance Rate Increases

The financial impact on your auto insurance can be severe. Insurers view flight from police as a major high-risk offense, like obstruction of justice. Expect premium increases of 100% to 300% after conviction.

Some insurers may deny coverage, forcing you into high-risk insurance pools. These policies often cost over $10,000 annually. These insurance consequences typically last at least six years from conviction.

Employment and Border Crossing Implications

Your career prospects may suffer after a flight conviction. Jobs requiring driving might become temporarily off-limits. Even non-driving positions can be affected, as many employers check criminal records.

Sectors particularly sensitive to flight from peace officer convictions include:

  • Security services
  • Law enforcement
  • Positions requiring bonding or security clearances

International travel becomes more complex after conviction. U.S. authorities may deem you inadmissible due to this offense. You can apply for a U.S. entry waiver, but it’s costly and time-consuming.

Defense Strategies Against Flight Charges

Facing charges for evading police in Canada? Knowing the right defense strategies can be crucial. The legal system offers ways to challenge these allegations. A strong defense examines your case’s details and finds weaknesses in the prosecution’s arguments.

Effective defense often questions if all offense elements are properly established. The Crown must prove beyond doubt that you intentionally fled from police. They must show you knew you were being pursued.

Challenging the Elements of the Offense

A key defense approach scrutinizes each required element of the flight charge. Your lawyer may contest whether:

  • You were actually operating the vehicle in question
  • Police signals to stop were clear and visible
  • You were aware you were being pursued by law enforcement
  • Your actions constituted an intentional escape attempt

Evidence can include poor visibility, faulty police equipment, or inability to recognize the pursuing vehicle. The Crown must prove you had no valid reason for not stopping. They must show your intent was to escape police.

If all elements aren’t proven beyond doubt, the charge may not stand. This matters when reckless driving is alleged but intent to flee is questionable.

Charter Rights Violations

Another strong defense involves identifying potential violations of your Charter rights. These might include:

  • Section 8 violations (unreasonable search and seizure)
  • Section 9 violations (arbitrary detention)
  • Section 10 violations (rights upon arrest)

An unlawful traffic stop without reasonable grounds could undermine the entire case. If excessive force was used or you weren’t informed of your rights, your lawyer may file a Charter application.

Successful Charter challenges can lead to evidence exclusion or charges being stayed. Courts take these constitutional protections seriously. Violations can significantly impact your case’s outcome.

Necessity and Duress Defenses

Sometimes, you may have had legitimate reasons for not stopping when signaled. These defenses acknowledge you didn’t stop but had justifiable cause.

Emergency Situations

Genuine emergencies requiring immediate travel might excuse failing to stop. Examples include:

  • Rushing to a hospital for a medical emergency
  • Responding to an urgent family crisis
  • Avoiding an immediate threat or danger

Courts may accept these defenses with evidence of the emergency. You must show your actions were reasonable under the circumstances. Prove your failure to stop wasn’t to evade justice.

Fear of Harm Defenses

You may have had safety concerns about stopping immediately. This defense can be relevant if:

  • The stop occurred in a remote location late at night
  • You had reason to believe someone was impersonating a police officer
  • You were in a vulnerable position or location

Courts recognize that driving to a well-lit, public location before stopping may be reasonable. You should acknowledge police presence by signaling or slowing down. Drive safely to a more appropriate stopping point.

Your actions must show you weren’t trying to escape. Instead, you were seeking a safer interaction environment. Maintain a reasonable speed and avoid reckless driving to strengthen this defense.

What to Do If Charged with Flight from a Peace Officer

Fleeing from law enforcement in Canada can lead to serious consequences. The charges carry heavy penalties and may impact your future. Taking the right steps after being charged can protect your rights and strengthen your defense.

Your actions during this time can greatly influence legal proceedings. It’s crucial to understand how to respond properly. This knowledge can help you navigate the legal system more effectively.

Immediate Steps After Being Charged

After your arrest, be careful about what you say. Exercise your right to remain silent beyond giving basic information. If police ask questions, politely request to speak with a lawyer first.

Write down everything you remember about the incident as soon as possible. Include details about weather, road conditions, and police vehicle markings. Note if emergency lights and sirens were visible and audible.

Ask for all evidence against you. This includes police reports, dash cam footage, and witness statements. This information is crucial for your defense, especially in cases involving endangerment allegations.

Finding Appropriate Legal Representation

Getting a qualified lawyer is crucial after being charged. Look for attorneys with experience in flight from peace officer cases. These cases involve unique elements under Section 249.1 of the Criminal Code.

A skilled defense lawyer doesn’t just represent you in court—they guide you through the entire legal process, identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, and help you understand all available options.

When choosing a lawyer, consider their experience with similar cases. Check their knowledge of local court procedures and prosecutors. Discuss fee structures and payment options clearly.

Most provincial law societies offer referral services for qualified attorneys. Use free initial consultations to assess the lawyer’s understanding of high-speed pursuit cases.

Navigating the Court Process

The court process for these charges follows a structured path. Your first appearance is typically an arraignment. Here, the charges are formally read and you enter an initial plea.

After arraignment, your lawyer will receive and analyze evidence from the Crown. This analysis forms the basis of your defense strategy. Your lawyer may challenge various aspects of the case.

Strictly comply with all bail conditions and attend every required court appearance. Your lawyer may negotiate for reduced charges or a favorable plea agreement.

Remember, conviction rates for these charges can be high. Qualified legal representation is essential for achieving the best possible outcome in your case.

Proper Conduct During Police Traffic Stops

Blue lights in your rearview mirror signal a police encounter. Your actions can impact the outcome. Responding appropriately ensures safety and prevents escalation into serious charges like flight from a peace officer.

The initial moments after being signaled to pull over are crucial. They set the tone for the interaction.

When you see emergency lights or hear sirens, signal to stop. Reduce speed and pull over safely as soon as possible. If it’s dark or isolated, proceed to a well-lit, public place.

Acknowledge the officer by activating your hazard lights. Maintain a reasonable speed while finding a safe spot.

Your Legal Rights When Pulled Over

Knowing your legal rights during a traffic stop empowers you. It helps you navigate confidently while protecting yourself legally. Canadian law balances law enforcement needs with individual rights.

During a traffic stop, you have specific rights. These include knowing why you’ve been stopped and remaining silent beyond basic identification.

  • Know why you’ve been stopped (though officers aren’t always required to tell you immediately)
  • Remain silent beyond providing basic identification information
  • Refuse vehicle searches without a warrant (with certain exceptions)
  • Record the interaction (though it’s courteous to inform the officer)

You must provide your name, address, and driver’s license. Vehicle registration and insurance information are also required. You’re not obligated to answer questions about your activities or drinking.

Refusing breathalyzer tests carries separate penalties under Canadian law. Be aware of these consequences before making a decision.

How to Safely Interact with Law Enforcement

Your conduct during a traffic stop can influence the outcome. Following these guidelines helps ensure a safe interaction for everyone involved:

  • Remain in your vehicle unless instructed otherwise
  • Keep your hands visible, preferably on the steering wheel
  • Avoid sudden movements that could be misinterpreted
  • Inform the officer before reaching for documents
  • Address officers respectfully, regardless of your feelings about the stop

If you believe your rights are being violated, comply in the moment. Address concerns later through proper legal channels. Arguing or resisting can escalate the situation.

Resisting during the stop may lead to additional charges. It’s best to cooperate and handle issues afterward.

Evading arrest or fleeing from a traffic stop is a serious criminal offense. It has severe consequences. Even if you think the stop is unjustified, pull over promptly.

Address any concerns through appropriate legal avenues afterward. This is always the safer choice.

Conclusion

Flight from a peace officer is a serious driving offense in Canada. Ignoring police signals can turn a routine stop into a criminal matter. These charges carry hefty penalties that impact your freedom and future.

The Criminal Code sets clear boundaries between lawful compliance and criminal evasion. Understanding what prosecutors must prove gives you valuable insight for prevention and defense.

Timely legal representation is crucial if you face charges. Provincial variations make specialized legal knowledge essential. Consequences extend beyond court penalties to license suspensions and insurance hikes.

Prevention is your best protection. Knowing how to respond during traffic stops helps avoid serious charges. Understand your legal obligations when signaled by police to protect yourself.

The line between panic and criminal flight is thin, but legally significant. Stay informed about your rights on Canadian roads. This knowledge safeguards you against potential legal complications.

FAQ

What exactly constitutes flight from a peace officer under Canadian law?

Flight from a peace officer happens when you drive a vehicle while being pursued by police. You fail to stop as soon as possible without a valid reason. This offense is defined in Section 320.17 of the Criminal Code of Canada.Key elements include knowing you’re being pursued and choosing not to stop. The officer must clearly signal for you to pull over.

What are the maximum penalties for flight from a peace officer?

For less serious cases, you could face up to two years less a day in jail. You may also have to pay fines. More serious cases can result in up to 10 years in prison.You’ll likely get driving bans ranging from one year to life. The length depends on how serious your case is.

Can I be charged if I didn’t realize a police officer was trying to pull me over?

Yes, but not knowing may be a defense. The Crown must prove you knew or should have known you were being chased. You might have a valid defense if you can show you truly didn’t see the police signals.This could be due to poor visibility or faulty police equipment. Not recognizing the pursuing vehicle as police could also be a defense.

What should I do if I’m being pulled over in an isolated or dark area?

If you’re worried about safety, you can drive to a well-lit, public spot. Turn on your hazard lights and keep a reasonable speed. This shows you plan to stop.Courts understand that sometimes it’s safer to find a better place to pull over. Just make sure you signal your intention to comply.

How will a conviction affect my insurance rates?

Insurance companies see flight from police as a major high-risk offense. Your premiums could increase by 100% to 300% after conviction. Some insurers might refuse to cover you at all.You could end up in high-risk insurance pools with yearly premiums over ,000. These effects usually last at least six years from your conviction date.

Can I travel to the United States with a flight from police conviction?

This conviction is a crime of moral turpitude under U.S. immigration law. It could make you inadmissible to the United States. This may affect your business trips, family visits, and vacations.You can apply for a U.S. entry waiver. But it’s a long process with high fees and no guarantee of approval.

What immediate steps should I take if charged with flight from a peace officer?

Use your right to remain silent. Only give basic identifying information. Don’t discuss the incident with police without a lawyer present. Ask for all evidence against you.Write down what you remember about the event. Find a criminal defense lawyer who knows about these cases.

Are there any valid defenses for flight from a peace officer charges?

Yes, you can challenge whether you were driving or if police signals were clear. You might argue you didn’t know you were being chased. Look for Charter rights violations during the pursuit or arrest.Medical emergencies or real fear for your safety if you stopped could be defenses. These are called necessity or duress defenses.

How do provincial laws affect flight from peace officer charges?

Flight from a peace officer is a federal crime. But provincial traffic laws add extra penalties. Ontario immediately suspends your license and impounds your car for seven days.Quebec can suspend your license for up to 90 days right away. These provincial penalties are on top of any criminal punishments.

Can a flight from police charge be reduced to a lesser offense?

Yes, through plea deals, charges might be lowered to less serious offenses. These could include dangerous driving or careless driving. It depends on the chase details, your record, and the prosecutor’s choice.A good defense lawyer is key for negotiating possible charge reductions.

What rights do I have during a traffic stop?

You have the right to know why you’ve been stopped. You must give your name, address, license, registration, and insurance info. Beyond that, you can stay silent.You can refuse searches without a warrant, with some exceptions. You can’t refuse breathalyzer tests without facing separate charges.

How does flight from a peace officer differ from dangerous driving?

Flight from a peace officer means not stopping when chased by police. It doesn’t matter how you’re driving. Dangerous driving focuses on reckless behavior that puts others at risk.You can get flight charges even if you’re driving normally but ignoring police signals to stop.

What happens to my driver’s license after a conviction?

License suspensions almost always follow a conviction. First offenses usually get at least a one-year suspension. It increases for later offenses. These are separate from court-ordered driving bans.Before getting your license back, you might need to take classes or pass tests. Requirements vary by province.

Can I be charged with flight from a peace officer if I’m operating a boat?

Yes, the law includes vessels too. If you’re in a boat and don’t stop for police or coast guard, you can be charged. The same rules and penalties apply as with cars.

What if I fled because I was having a medical emergency?

A real medical emergency might be a “reasonable excuse” for not stopping right away. You’d need proof of the emergency. You’d also have to show your actions made sense given the situation.Courts would check if you acknowledged the police, like by using hazard lights. They’d also consider if you drove safely while getting medical help.

Related posts

Understanding Failure to Provide Necessaries in Canada

What Happens When You Fail to Appear in Canadian Court

Failing or Refusing a Breath Demand in Canada Law